This may be R#'s fault but I thought I'd try here first. It's definitely not xunit's fault, running the test with the VS xunit extension works ok.
public void TesTshim()
Id #4174 | Release:
| Updated: Sep 22 at 6:01 PM by georgiosd | Created: Sep 21 at 9:23 PM by georgiosd
I just tested the latest EAP release of ReSharper 8 and the current stable one of dito. I have the following setup.
A Windows store xUnit test project created with the "unofficial" project ...
Id #4172 | Release:
| Updated: Aug 20 at 10:05 AM by mattellis | Created: Aug 20 at 9:05 AM by sedanwer
If you try to run tests in the wrong bit-ness host process (i.e. a 32 bit host tries to load a 64 bit assembly, or vice versa, or an MSIL host tries to load 32 bit) the test run fails with a massiv...
Id #4170 | Release:
| Updated: Aug 12 at 10:01 AM by mattellis | Created: Aug 12 at 10:00 AM by mattellis
When I try to run a unit test that is referencing xUnit 2, I get the following error:
Unit Test Runner
Unit Test Runner failed to run tests
Id #4163 | Release:
| Updated: Jun 6 at 8:38 PM by mattellis | Created: Jun 6 at 5:39 PM by VoiceOfWisdom
Requesting Moles support. ReSharper 6.1 supports Moles for MSTest (http://youtrack.jetbrains.net/issue/RSRP-260304) and has an open issue for supporting it for NUnit (http://youtrack.jetbrains.net/...
Id #4140 | Release:
| Updated: Jan 13, 2012 at 2:45 AM by StephenSwensen | Created: Jan 13, 2012 at 2:45 AM by StephenSwensen
The resharper plugin for the test runner use xunit.dll to recognise when a method is a test method. It does not affect how tests are run (the runner part of the test provider is compiled against th...
Id #4123 | Release:
| Updated: Jul 5, 2011 at 11:52 AM by jgauffin | Created: Apr 14, 2011 at 7:03 AM by mattellis
Taken from roadmap comments:
+1 for collection assertion, but I think this is in 1.5 CTP...?
Id #2072 | Release:
| Updated: May 5, 2011 at 9:43 PM by the_drow | Created: Jun 22, 2009 at 8:27 PM by pfm102
As per roadmap page's comment:
mbUnit has a nice feature where if an assertion on a string fails then it will generate an object-specific ToString implementation so that that is seen in the log, ra...
Id #2071 | Release:
| Updated: May 5, 2011 at 9:43 PM by the_drow | Created: Jun 22, 2009 at 8:23 PM by pfm102
As per comment on roadmap page:
+1 for contract verifiers. I needed to test all implementers of IEquatable<T> the other day, and ended up getting partial coverage via LINQing over reflection to pu...
Id #2070 | Release:
| Updated: Jul 5, 2012 at 8:43 PM by johncrim | Created: Jun 22, 2009 at 8:22 PM by pfm102
For example, methods named "CreateFoo_returns_X_for_Y" or "CreateFoo_fails_for_null_Y" would be more readable in the output if you replaced the underscores with spaces.
After seeing http://xunit.c...
Id #1428 | Release:
| Updated: Dec 7, 2012 at 4:21 PM by chester89 | Created: Mar 20, 2009 at 3:09 PM by EmperorXLII