When I try to run a unit test that is referencing xUnit 2, I get the following error:
Unit Test Runner
Unit Test Runner failed to run tests
Id #4163 | Release:
| Updated: Jun 6 at 7:38 PM by mattellis | Created: Jun 6 at 4:39 PM by VoiceOfWisdom
I have some base classes for reused tests (some of them abstract, some of them concrete).
When running ALL tests in the solution from resharper integration, all the tests in the base classes are ...
Id #4162 | Release:
| Updated: Tue at 8:09 AM by cowst | Created: May 21 at 11:58 AM by Sgro
Requesting Moles support. ReSharper 6.1 supports Moles for MSTest (http://youtrack.jetbrains.net/issue/RSRP-260304) and has an open issue for supporting it for NUnit (http://youtrack.jetbrains.net/...
Id #4140 | Release:
| Updated: Jan 13, 2012 at 1:45 AM by StephenSwensen | Created: Jan 13, 2012 at 1:45 AM by StephenSwensen
The resharper plugin for the test runner use xunit.dll to recognise when a method is a test method. It does not affect how tests are run (the runner part of the test provider is compiled against th...
Id #4123 | Release:
| Updated: Jul 5, 2011 at 10:52 AM by jgauffin | Created: Apr 14, 2011 at 6:03 AM by mattellis
Taken from roadmap comments:
+1 for collection assertion, but I think this is in 1.5 CTP...?
Id #2072 | Release:
| Updated: May 5, 2011 at 8:43 PM by the_drow | Created: Jun 22, 2009 at 7:27 PM by pfm102
As per roadmap page's comment:
mbUnit has a nice feature where if an assertion on a string fails then it will generate an object-specific ToString implementation so that that is seen in the log, ra...
Id #2071 | Release:
| Updated: May 5, 2011 at 8:43 PM by the_drow | Created: Jun 22, 2009 at 7:23 PM by pfm102
As per comment on roadmap page:
+1 for contract verifiers. I needed to test all implementers of IEquatable<T> the other day, and ended up getting partial coverage via LINQing over reflection to pu...
Id #2070 | Release:
| Updated: Jul 5, 2012 at 7:43 PM by johncrim | Created: Jun 22, 2009 at 7:22 PM by pfm102
For example, methods named "CreateFoo_returns_X_for_Y" or "CreateFoo_fails_for_null_Y" would be more readable in the output if you replaced the underscores with spaces.
After seeing http://xunit.c...
Id #1428 | Release:
| Updated: Dec 7, 2012 at 3:21 PM by chester89 | Created: Mar 20, 2009 at 2:09 PM by EmperorXLII